head to head · open source
ant-design vs Gum
ant-design has 99,542 GitHub stars, 54,717 forks, 1,066 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Gum has 620 stars, 81 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped today. ant-design leads on adoption by 15,955% (99,542 vs 620 stars). ant-design is written in TypeScript under MIT; Gum is written in C# under MIT. ant-design has attracted 55% as many forks as stars, Gum 13%. Gum was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 15422 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ant-design | Gum | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 100K | ★ 620 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | C# |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 55K | ⑂ 81 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ant-design if
- You weight community size — 100K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Gum if
- You want the Gum feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and Gum fits your workflow better
About ant-design
Ant Design (antd) is an enterprise class UI design language and React UI library that gives teams a full set of production ready React components, design resources and tooling for building web applications.
read the full ant-design overview →
About Gum
Gum is an MIT licensed C UI layout tool built on object oriented principles, distributed as NuGet runtimes for MonoGame, KNI, raylib, SkiaSharp, MAUI and FNA, and intended for developers who need one flexible, inheritance driven layout system across game engines and .NET platforms.
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Design & Prototyping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ant-design or Gum more popular?
ant-design has 99,542 GitHub stars and Gum has 620. ant-design has the larger community by that measure.
Are ant-design and Gum free?
Both are open source. ant-design is licensed under MIT and Gum under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ant-design and Gum?
ant-design is written in TypeScript and Gum in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ant-design or Gum?
Choose ant-design if you want the larger community (99,542 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Gum if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.