head to head · open source

ant-design vs functional-ui-kit

ant-design has 99,669 GitHub stars, 54,689 forks, 1,066 open issues and last shipped today. functional-ui-kit has 620 stars, 26 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. ant-design leads on adoption by 15,976% (99,669 vs 620 stars). ant-design is written in TypeScript under MIT; functional-ui-kit is written in TypeScript under MIT. ant-design has attracted 55% as many forks as stars, functional-ui-kit 4%. ant-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (react, ui-library), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ant-design ★ 100K functional-ui-kit ★ 620 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ant-design functional-ui-kit
GitHub stars ★ 100K ★ 620
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-04 2026-09-24
Forks ⑂ 55K ⑂ 26
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ant-design if

  • You weight community size — 100K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ant-design profile →

pick functional-ui-kit if

  • You want the functional-ui-kit feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and functional-ui-kit fits your workflow better

full functional-ui-kit profile →

About ant-design

Ant Design (antd) is an enterprise class UI design language and React UI library that gives teams a full set of production ready React components, design resources and tooling for building web applications.

read the full ant-design overview →

About functional-ui-kit

functional ui kit is a TypeScript React component library with a matching Figma library for design and development teams that want designers and engineers working from the same variables and component names.

read the full functional-ui-kit overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 188K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 95K OpenCut ★ 92K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim ant-design vs fleetbase open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim ant-design vs anime ant-design vs hyperframes ant-design vs daisyui ant-design vs tabler ant-design vs motion ant-design vs layui ant-design vs lottie-ios ant-design vs vant ant-design vs primitives ant-design vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is ant-design or functional-ui-kit more popular?

ant-design has 99,669 GitHub stars and functional-ui-kit has 620. ant-design has the larger community by that measure.

Are ant-design and functional-ui-kit free?

Both are open source. ant-design is licensed under MIT and functional-ui-kit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ant-design and functional-ui-kit?

ant-design is written in TypeScript and functional-ui-kit in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ant-design or functional-ui-kit?

Choose ant-design if you want the larger community (99,669 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose functional-ui-kit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.