head to head · open source

ant-design vs flowbite

ant-design has 99,542 GitHub stars, 54,717 forks, 1,066 open issues and last shipped yesterday. flowbite has 9,357 stars, 862 forks, 257 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. ant-design leads on adoption by 964% (99,542 vs 9,357 stars). ant-design is written in TypeScript under MIT; flowbite is written in HTML under MIT. ant-design has attracted 55% as many forks as stars, flowbite 9%. ant-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ant-design ★ 100K flowbite ★ 9.4K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

ant-design flowbite
GitHub stars ★ 100K ★ 9.4K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript HTML
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-06-27
Forks ⑂ 55K ⑂ 862
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ant-design if

  • You weight community size — 100K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ant-design profile →

pick flowbite if

  • You want the flowbite feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and flowbite fits your workflow better

full flowbite profile →

About ant-design

Ant Design (antd) is an enterprise class UI design language and React UI library that gives teams a full set of production ready React components, design resources and tooling for building web applications.

read the full ant-design overview →

About flowbite

Flowbite is an open source UI component library and front end development framework built on top of Tailwind CSS, intended for developers and design teams who want ready made components rather than writing every utility class by hand.

read the full flowbite overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida openpencil vs draw-io openpencil vs plasmic draw-io vs plasmic firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim ant-design vs anime ant-design vs hyperframes ant-design vs daisyui ant-design vs tabler ant-design vs motion ant-design vs layui ant-design vs Figma-Context-MCP ant-design vs Tkinter-Designer ant-design vs pencil ant-design vs dicebear

Frequently asked questions

Is ant-design or flowbite more popular?

ant-design has 99,542 GitHub stars and flowbite has 9,357. ant-design has the larger community by that measure.

Are ant-design and flowbite free?

Both are open source. ant-design is licensed under MIT and flowbite under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ant-design and flowbite?

ant-design is written in TypeScript and flowbite in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ant-design or flowbite?

Choose ant-design if you want the larger community (99,542 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose flowbite if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.