head to head · open source
ant-design vs FigmaToCode
ant-design has 100,068 GitHub stars, 54,630 forks, 1,066 open issues and last shipped today. FigmaToCode has 5,264 stars, 507 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. ant-design leads on adoption by 1,801% (100,068 vs 5,264 stars). ant-design is written in TypeScript under MIT; FigmaToCode is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. ant-design has attracted 55% as many forks as stars, FigmaToCode 10%. ant-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (react), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ant-design | FigmaToCode | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 100K | ★ 5.3K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-08-05 |
| Forks | ⑂ 55K | ⑂ 507 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ant-design if
- You weight community size — 100K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick FigmaToCode if
- You want the FigmaToCode feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and FigmaToCode fits your workflow better
About ant-design
Ant Design An enterprise class UI design language and React UI library. [![CI status][github action image]][github action url] [![codecov][codecov image]][codecov url] [![NPM version][npm image]][npm url] [![NPM downloads][download image]][download url] [![][bundlephobia image]][bundlephobia url] [![][jsdelivr image]][jsdelivr url] [![Follow Twitter][twitter image]][twitter url] [![dumi][dumi image]][dumi url] [![FOSSA Status][fossa image]][fossa url] [![Issues need help][help wanted image]][help wanted url] [![LFX Active Contributors][lfx image]][lfx url] Changelog · [Report Bug][github issues url] · [Request…
read the full ant-design overview →
About FigmaToCode
Figma to Code Fast, flexible Figma to code conversion. Private by design. Generate editable HTML, React, Svelte, Tailwind, Flutter, and SwiftUI from a Figma selection—without an account, generation credits, or design uploads. Install the free plugin · Explore the website Why this plugin exists Figma to Code is for the moment between a visual design and a real implementation. Select a frame, component, or smaller group of layers and get a readable visual scaffold that you can copy, refine, or download as a starter project. The generator is deterministic and runs inside Figma's plugin sandbox. It does not call an…
read the full FigmaToCode overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Design & Prototyping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ant-design or FigmaToCode more popular?
ant-design has 100,068 GitHub stars and FigmaToCode has 5,264. ant-design has the larger community by that measure.
Are ant-design and FigmaToCode free?
Both are open source. ant-design is licensed under MIT and FigmaToCode under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ant-design and FigmaToCode?
ant-design is written in TypeScript and FigmaToCode in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ant-design or FigmaToCode?
Choose ant-design if you want the larger community (100,068 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose FigmaToCode if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.