head to head · open source

ant-design vs Easy3D

ant-design has 99,540 GitHub stars, 54,718 forks, 1,066 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Easy3D has 1,656 stars, 277 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 23 days ago. ant-design leads on adoption by 5,911% (99,540 vs 1,656 stars). ant-design is written in TypeScript under MIT; Easy3D is written in C++ under GPL-3.0. ant-design has attracted 55% as many forks as stars, Easy3D 17%. ant-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ant-design ★ 100K Easy3D ★ 1.7K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

ant-design Easy3D
GitHub stars ★ 100K ★ 1.7K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript C++
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-08-27
Forks ⑂ 55K ⑂ 277
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ant-design if

  • You weight community size — 100K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ant-design profile →

pick Easy3D if

  • You want the Easy3D feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and Easy3D fits your workflow better

full Easy3D profile →

About ant-design

Ant Design (antd) is an enterprise class UI design language and React UI library that gives teams a full set of production ready React components, design resources and tooling for building web applications.

read the full ant-design overview →

About Easy3D

Easy3D is a lightweight C++ library with Python bindings for processing and rendering 3D data, built for researchers, educators, and developers who need point clouds, polygonal meshes, polyhedral volumes, and graphs handled efficiently without writing low level OpenGL code.

read the full Easy3D overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida openpencil vs draw-io openpencil vs plasmic draw-io vs plasmic firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim ant-design vs anime ant-design vs hyperframes ant-design vs daisyui ant-design vs tabler ant-design vs Figma-Context-MCP ant-design vs Tkinter-Designer ant-design vs pencil ant-design vs dicebear ant-design vs OpenPencil ant-design vs draw.io

Frequently asked questions

Is ant-design or Easy3D more popular?

ant-design has 99,540 GitHub stars and Easy3D has 1,656. ant-design has the larger community by that measure.

Are ant-design and Easy3D free?

Both are open source. ant-design is licensed under MIT and Easy3D under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ant-design and Easy3D?

ant-design is written in TypeScript and Easy3D in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ant-design or Easy3D?

Choose ant-design if you want the larger community (99,540 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Easy3D if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.