head to head · open source

ant-design vs doodle

ant-design has 99,705 GitHub stars, 54,678 forks, 1,066 open issues and last shipped today. doodle has 799 stars, 32 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. ant-design leads on adoption by 12,379% (99,705 vs 799 stars). ant-design is written in TypeScript under MIT; doodle is written in Kotlin under MIT. ant-design has attracted 55% as many forks as stars, doodle 4%. ant-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ui-kit), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ant-design ★ 100K doodle ★ 799 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ant-design doodle
GitHub stars ★ 100K ★ 799
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Kotlin
Last push 2026-10-08 2025-11-26
Forks ⑂ 55K ⑂ 32
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ant-design if

  • You weight community size — 100K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ant-design profile →

pick doodle if

  • You want the doodle feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and doodle fits your workflow better

full doodle profile →

About ant-design

Ant Design (antd) is an enterprise class UI design language and React UI library that gives teams a full set of production ready React components, design resources and tooling for building web applications.

read the full ant-design overview →

About doodle

Doodle is a pure Kotlin UI framework for building applications that run on both the Web and the Desktop, aimed at developers who want to write their entire interface in Kotlin across JVM, JavaScript, and Wasm targets.

read the full doodle overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 190K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K open-design ★ 100K manim ★ 95K OpenCut ★ 93K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim ant-design vs fleetbase open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim ant-design vs anime ant-design vs hyperframes ant-design vs daisyui ant-design vs tabler ant-design vs motion ant-design vs layui ant-design vs lottie-ios ant-design vs vant ant-design vs primitives ant-design vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is ant-design or doodle more popular?

ant-design has 99,705 GitHub stars and doodle has 799. ant-design has the larger community by that measure.

Are ant-design and doodle free?

Both are open source. ant-design is licensed under MIT and doodle under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ant-design and doodle?

ant-design is written in TypeScript and doodle in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ant-design or doodle?

Choose ant-design if you want the larger community (99,705 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose doodle if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.