head to head · open source

ant-design vs charm

ant-design has 99,540 GitHub stars, 54,718 forks, 1,066 open issues and last shipped yesterday. charm has 649 stars, 169 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. ant-design leads on adoption by 15,237% (99,540 vs 649 stars). ant-design is written in TypeScript under MIT; charm is written in Python under LGPL-3.0. ant-design has attracted 55% as many forks as stars, charm 26%. ant-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ant-design ★ 100K charm ★ 649 category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

ant-design charm
GitHub stars ★ 100K ★ 649
License MIT LGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 55K ⑂ 169
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ant-design if

  • You weight community size — 100K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ant-design profile →

pick charm if

  • You want the charm feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the LGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and charm fits your workflow better

full charm profile →

About ant-design

Ant Design (antd) is an enterprise class UI design language and React UI library that gives teams a full set of production ready React components, design resources and tooling for building web applications.

read the full ant-design overview →

About charm

Charm (Charm Crypto) is a Python based framework for rapidly prototyping advanced cryptosystems — attribute based encryption, identity based encryption, pairing based schemes, threshold ECDSA, and zero knowledge proofs — built for researchers and engineers who need working schemes without hand writing the underlying mathematics.

read the full charm overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida openpencil vs draw-io openpencil vs plasmic draw-io vs plasmic firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim ant-design vs anime ant-design vs hyperframes ant-design vs daisyui ant-design vs tabler ant-design vs Figma-Context-MCP ant-design vs Tkinter-Designer ant-design vs pencil ant-design vs dicebear ant-design vs OpenPencil ant-design vs draw.io

Frequently asked questions

Is ant-design or charm more popular?

ant-design has 99,540 GitHub stars and charm has 649. ant-design has the larger community by that measure.

Are ant-design and charm free?

Both are open source. ant-design is licensed under MIT and charm under LGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ant-design and charm?

ant-design is written in TypeScript and charm in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ant-design or charm?

Choose ant-design if you want the larger community (99,540 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose charm if its feature set, stack or LGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.