head to head · open source
ansible-nas vs Ghosten-Player
ansible-nas has 3,799 GitHub stars, 509 forks, 102 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. Ghosten-Player has 3,392 stars, 211 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. ansible-nas leads on adoption by 12% (3,799 vs 3,392 stars). ansible-nas is written in Jinja under MIT; Ghosten-Player is written in Dart under AGPL-3.0. ansible-nas has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, Ghosten-Player 6%. Ghosten-Player was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ansible-nas | Ghosten-Player | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 3.8K | ★ 3.4K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Jinja | Dart |
| Last push | 2026-02-17 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 509 | ⑂ 211 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ansible-nas if
- You weight community size — 3.8K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Jinja
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Ghosten-Player if
- You want the Ghosten-Player feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Dart
- You evaluated both and Ghosten-Player fits your workflow better
About ansible-nas
Ansible NAS After getting burned by broken FreeNAS updates one too many times, I figured I could do a much better job myself using just a stock Ubuntu install, some clever Ansible config and a bunch of Docker containers. What Ansible NAS Does You can configure Ansible NAS to set up any (or all!) of the applications listed below on your home server. If you have a spare domain name you can configure applications to be accessible externally to your home LAN too; they'll be configured with a sensible hostname and DNS gets updated accordingly if your home IP address changes. Available Applications Airsonic catalog…
read the full ansible-nas overview →
About Ghosten-Player
中文 English Ghosten Player 是一款同时适配 📱 Android Phone 和 📺 Android TV 的视频播放器(未来将支持 Windows 和 macOS)。整合影视资源，自动刮削媒体信息，支持IPTV播放，优雅打造私人影视库。 界面简洁，功能丰富，开箱即用。 如果项目对您有帮助，就请给颗🌟Star吧。 项目处于用爱发电阶段，请考虑赞助支持项目持续维护。您的支持是我维护的最大动力(′･ω･ ) Features 自动刮削媒体信息 themoviedb nfo 客户端 Android Phone 和 Android Pad Android TV Windows (开发中) Macos (开发中) 网盘支持 支持阿里云盘、夸克网盘、Webdav和本地媒体文件 支持Emby和Jellyfin 清晰度切换(阿里云盘) 多账号登录 网盘文件查看和管理 文件下载和边下边播 多线程网络加速 IPTV 线路切换 自动分组 节目时间表EPG 播放器 手势操作(双击播放/暂停/快进/快退，音量/亮度调节，画面缩放，拖动快进，长按倍速等) 跳过片头/片尾 播放内嵌字幕和外置字幕[^2] 倍速播放 视频轨道选择 DLNA投屏 自定义字幕样式 UI 中英双语 浅色和深色模式 支持手机端辅助TV端输入 自定义界面大小 TV端自定义按键 其他 纯本地运行，无需后端服务支持 [^1] 软件体积小 (≈ 15…
read the full Ghosten-Player overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Media & Streaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ansible-nas or Ghosten-Player more popular?
ansible-nas has 3,799 GitHub stars and Ghosten-Player has 3,392. ansible-nas has the larger community by that measure.
Are ansible-nas and Ghosten-Player free?
Both are open source. ansible-nas is licensed under MIT and Ghosten-Player under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ansible-nas and Ghosten-Player?
ansible-nas is written in Jinja and Ghosten-Player in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ansible-nas or Ghosten-Player?
Choose ansible-nas if you want the larger community (3,799 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Ghosten-Player if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.