head to head · open source
aframe vs entt
aframe has 17,686 GitHub stars, 4,405 forks, 338 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. entt has 13,239 stars, 1,123 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped yesterday. aframe leads on adoption by 34% (17,686 vs 13,239 stars). aframe is written in JavaScript under MIT; entt is written in C++ under MIT. aframe has attracted 25% as many forks as stars, entt 8%. entt was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ecs, game-development), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| aframe | entt | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 18K | ★ 13K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | C++ |
| Last push | 2026-07-13 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.4K | ⑂ 1.1K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick aframe if
- You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick entt if
- You want the entt feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You evaluated both and entt fits your workflow better
About aframe
A Frame A web framework for building browser based 3D, AR and VR experiences. Site — Docs — Examples — School — Community Examples Find more examples on the homepage, A Week of A Frame, and WebVR Directory. Features :eyeglasses: Virtual Reality Made Simple : A Frame handles the 3D and WebXR boilerplate required to get running across platforms including mobile, desktop, and all headsets (compatible with a WebXR capable browser) just by dropping in . :heart: Declarative HTML : HTML is easy to read and copy and paste. Since A Frame can be used from HTML, A Frame is accessible to everyone…
read the full aframe overview →
About entt
EnTT has been a dream so far, we haven't found a single bug to date and it's super easy to work with Every EnTT User Ever EnTT is a header only, tiny and easy to use library for game programming and much more written in modern C++ . Among others, it's used in Minecraft by Mojang, the ArcGIS Runtime SDKs by Esri and the amazing Ragdoll . If you don't see your project in the list, please open an issue, submit a PR or add the \ entt tag to your topics ! :+1: Do you want to keep up with changes or do you have a question that doesn't require you to open an issue? Join the gitter channel and the discord server, meet…
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Gaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is aframe or entt more popular?
aframe has 17,686 GitHub stars and entt has 13,239. aframe has the larger community by that measure.
Are aframe and entt free?
Both are open source. aframe is licensed under MIT and entt under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between aframe and entt?
aframe is written in JavaScript and entt in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, aframe or entt?
Choose aframe if you want the larger community (17,686 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose entt if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.