head to head · open source

WWDC vs ttt

WWDC has 8,742 GitHub stars, 767 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. ttt has 514 stars, 38 forks, 72 open issues and last shipped today. WWDC leads on adoption by 1,601% (8,742 vs 514 stars). WWDC is written in Swift under BSD-2-Clause; ttt is written in Go under MIT. WWDC has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, ttt 7%. ttt was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

WWDC ★ 8.7K ttt ★ 514 category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

WWDC ttt
GitHub stars ★ 8.7K ★ 514
License BSD-2-Clause MIT
Written in Swift Go
Last push 2026-06-17 2026-10-11
Forks ⑂ 767 ⑂ 38
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick WWDC if

  • You weight community size — 8.7K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full WWDC profile →

pick ttt if

  • You want the ttt feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and ttt fits your workflow better

full ttt profile →

About WWDC

WWDC is an unofficial, open source macOS app for Apple developers who want to watch conference sessions, follow the live schedule, and take searchable notes without leaving their Mac.

read the full WWDC overview →

About ttt

TTT Editor (Terminal Text Tool) is a single binary, zero config text editor that runs as a TUI in the terminal, aimed at developers who want a full featured coding environment without a GUI application.

read the full ttt overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 277K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 213K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 114K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

WWDC vs ECC WWDC vs react WWDC vs Langflow WWDC vs Supabase WWDC vs puppeteer WWDC vs archify WWDC vs rea WWDC vs PocketBase WWDC vs i-have-adhd WWDC vs codebase-memory-mcp WWDC vs herdr WWDC vs ToolJet

Frequently asked questions

Is WWDC or ttt more popular?

WWDC has 8,742 GitHub stars and ttt has 514. WWDC has the larger community by that measure.

Are WWDC and ttt free?

Both are open source. WWDC is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and ttt under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between WWDC and ttt?

WWDC is written in Swift and ttt in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, WWDC or ttt?

Choose WWDC if you want the larger community (8,742 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose ttt if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.