head to head · open source

ECC vs WWDC

ECC has 276,066 GitHub stars, 41,189 forks, 225 open issues and last shipped today. WWDC has 8,742 stars, 767 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. ECC leads on adoption by 3,058% (276,066 vs 8,742 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; WWDC is written in Swift under BSD-2-Clause. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, WWDC 9%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 276K WWDC ★ 8.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC WWDC
GitHub stars ★ 276K ★ 8.7K
License MIT BSD-2-Clause
Written in JavaScript Swift
Last push 2026-10-10 2026-06-17
Forks ⑂ 41K ⑂ 767
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 276K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick WWDC if

  • You want the WWDC feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and WWDC fits your workflow better

full WWDC profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About WWDC

WWDC is an unofficial, open source macOS app for Apple developers who want to watch conference sessions, follow the live schedule, and take searchable notes without leaving their Mac.

read the full WWDC overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 114K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs rea ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs herdr ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or WWDC more popular?

ECC has 276,066 GitHub stars and WWDC has 8,742. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and WWDC free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and WWDC under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and WWDC?

ECC is written in JavaScript and WWDC in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or WWDC?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (276,066 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose WWDC if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.