head to head · open source

i-have-adhd vs WWDC

i-have-adhd has 56,153 GitHub stars, 3,200 forks, 73 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. WWDC has 8,742 stars, 767 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. i-have-adhd leads on adoption by 542% (56,153 vs 8,742 stars). i-have-adhd is written in Python under MIT; WWDC is written in Swift under BSD-2-Clause. i-have-adhd has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, WWDC 9%. i-have-adhd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

i-have-adhd ★ 56K WWDC ★ 8.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

i-have-adhd WWDC
GitHub stars ★ 56K ★ 8.7K
License MIT BSD-2-Clause
Written in Python Swift
Last push 2026-10-06 2026-06-17
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 767
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick i-have-adhd if

  • You weight community size — 56K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full i-have-adhd profile →

pick WWDC if

  • You want the WWDC feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and WWDC fits your workflow better

full WWDC profile →

About i-have-adhd

i have adhd is a skill for coding agents, distributed as a Claude Code plugin, that stops the assistant from burying the answer inside preamble, recap, and closers.

read the full i-have-adhd overview →

About WWDC

WWDC is an unofficial, open source macOS app for Apple developers who want to watch conference sessions, follow the live schedule, and take searchable notes without leaving their Mac.

read the full WWDC overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 276K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 114K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

i-have-adhd vs ECC i-have-adhd vs react i-have-adhd vs Langflow i-have-adhd vs Supabase i-have-adhd vs puppeteer i-have-adhd vs archify i-have-adhd vs PocketBase i-have-adhd vs rea i-have-adhd vs codebase-memory-mcp i-have-adhd vs herdr i-have-adhd vs ToolJet i-have-adhd vs AppSmith

Frequently asked questions

Is i-have-adhd or WWDC more popular?

i-have-adhd has 56,153 GitHub stars and WWDC has 8,742. i-have-adhd has the larger community by that measure.

Are i-have-adhd and WWDC free?

Both are open source. i-have-adhd is licensed under MIT and WWDC under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between i-have-adhd and WWDC?

i-have-adhd is written in Python and WWDC in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, i-have-adhd or WWDC?

Choose i-have-adhd if you want the larger community (56,153 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose WWDC if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.