head to head · open source

codebase-memory-mcp vs WWDC

codebase-memory-mcp has 46,251 GitHub stars, 3,804 forks, 625 open issues and last shipped yesterday. WWDC has 8,742 stars, 767 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. codebase-memory-mcp leads on adoption by 429% (46,251 vs 8,742 stars). codebase-memory-mcp is written in C under MIT; WWDC is written in Swift under BSD-2-Clause. codebase-memory-mcp has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, WWDC 9%. codebase-memory-mcp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

codebase-memory-mcp ★ 46K WWDC ★ 8.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

codebase-memory-mcp WWDC
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 8.7K
License MIT BSD-2-Clause
Written in C Swift
Last push 2026-10-09 2026-06-17
Forks ⑂ 3.8K ⑂ 767
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick codebase-memory-mcp if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full codebase-memory-mcp profile →

pick WWDC if

  • You want the WWDC feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and WWDC fits your workflow better

full WWDC profile →

About codebase-memory-mcp

codebase memory mcp is a high performance code intelligence MCP server, written in C, that indexes a codebase into a persistent knowledge graph so AI coding agents can answer structural questions in under a millisecond, and it is built for developers and teams who run agents such as Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, aider, or Kilo Code against large repositories.

read the full codebase-memory-mcp overview →

About WWDC

WWDC is an unofficial, open source macOS app for Apple developers who want to watch conference sessions, follow the live schedule, and take searchable notes without leaving their Mac.

read the full WWDC overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 276K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 114K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

codebase-memory-mcp vs ECC codebase-memory-mcp vs react codebase-memory-mcp vs Langflow codebase-memory-mcp vs Supabase codebase-memory-mcp vs puppeteer codebase-memory-mcp vs archify codebase-memory-mcp vs PocketBase codebase-memory-mcp vs i-have-adhd codebase-memory-mcp vs rea codebase-memory-mcp vs herdr codebase-memory-mcp vs ToolJet codebase-memory-mcp vs AppSmith

Frequently asked questions

Is codebase-memory-mcp or WWDC more popular?

codebase-memory-mcp has 46,251 GitHub stars and WWDC has 8,742. codebase-memory-mcp has the larger community by that measure.

Are codebase-memory-mcp and WWDC free?

Both are open source. codebase-memory-mcp is licensed under MIT and WWDC under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between codebase-memory-mcp and WWDC?

codebase-memory-mcp is written in C and WWDC in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, codebase-memory-mcp or WWDC?

Choose codebase-memory-mcp if you want the larger community (46,251 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose WWDC if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.