head to head · open source

puppeteer vs WWDC

puppeteer has 95,673 GitHub stars, 9,590 forks, 259 open issues and last shipped yesterday. WWDC has 8,742 stars, 767 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. puppeteer leads on adoption by 994% (95,673 vs 8,742 stars). puppeteer is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; WWDC is written in Swift under BSD-2-Clause. puppeteer has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, WWDC 9%. puppeteer was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

puppeteer ★ 96K WWDC ★ 8.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

puppeteer WWDC
GitHub stars ★ 96K ★ 8.7K
License Apache-2.0 BSD-2-Clause
Written in TypeScript Swift
Last push 2026-10-09 2026-06-17
Forks ⑂ 9.6K ⑂ 767
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick puppeteer if

  • You weight community size — 96K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full puppeteer profile →

pick WWDC if

  • You want the WWDC feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and WWDC fits your workflow better

full WWDC profile →

About puppeteer

Puppeteer is an Apache 2.0 JavaScript and TypeScript library that provides a high level API for driving Chrome and Firefox over the DevTools Protocol or WebDriver BiDi, written for developers who automate browsers from Node.js.

read the full puppeteer overview →

About WWDC

WWDC is an unofficial, open source macOS app for Apple developers who want to watch conference sessions, follow the live schedule, and take searchable notes without leaving their Mac.

read the full WWDC overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 276K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 114K

Related comparisons

ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

puppeteer vs ECC puppeteer vs react puppeteer vs Langflow puppeteer vs Supabase puppeteer vs archify puppeteer vs PocketBase puppeteer vs i-have-adhd puppeteer vs rea puppeteer vs codebase-memory-mcp puppeteer vs herdr puppeteer vs ToolJet puppeteer vs AppSmith

Frequently asked questions

Is puppeteer or WWDC more popular?

puppeteer has 95,673 GitHub stars and WWDC has 8,742. puppeteer has the larger community by that measure.

Are puppeteer and WWDC free?

Both are open source. puppeteer is licensed under Apache-2.0 and WWDC under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between puppeteer and WWDC?

puppeteer is written in TypeScript and WWDC in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, puppeteer or WWDC?

Choose puppeteer if you want the larger community (95,673 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose WWDC if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.