head to head · open source

PocketBase vs WWDC

PocketBase has 61,338 GitHub stars, 3,728 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. WWDC has 8,742 stars, 767 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. PocketBase leads on adoption by 602% (61,338 vs 8,742 stars). PocketBase is written in Go under MIT; WWDC is written in Swift under BSD-2-Clause. PocketBase has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, WWDC 9%. PocketBase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

PocketBase ★ 61K WWDC ★ 8.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

PocketBase WWDC
GitHub stars ★ 61K ★ 8.7K
License MIT BSD-2-Clause
Written in Go Swift
Last push 2026-10-08 2026-06-17
Forks ⑂ 3.7K ⑂ 767
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick PocketBase if

  • You weight community size — 61K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full PocketBase profile →

pick WWDC if

  • You want the WWDC feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and WWDC fits your workflow better

full WWDC profile →

About PocketBase

PocketBase is an open source backend framework written in Go that bundles a SQLite database, authentication, file storage, admin dashboard, and REST API into a single executable file. It lives in the Go ecosystem and targets developers who want a lightweight, self contained backend without managing separate services like PostgreSQL, Redis, or a separate auth server.

read the full PocketBase overview →

About WWDC

WWDC is an unofficial, open source macOS app for Apple developers who want to watch conference sessions, follow the live schedule, and take searchable notes without leaving their Mac.

read the full WWDC overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 276K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 114K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

PocketBase vs ECC PocketBase vs react PocketBase vs Langflow PocketBase vs Supabase PocketBase vs puppeteer PocketBase vs archify PocketBase vs i-have-adhd PocketBase vs rea PocketBase vs codebase-memory-mcp PocketBase vs herdr PocketBase vs ToolJet PocketBase vs AppSmith

Frequently asked questions

Is PocketBase or WWDC more popular?

PocketBase has 61,338 GitHub stars and WWDC has 8,742. PocketBase has the larger community by that measure.

Are PocketBase and WWDC free?

Both are open source. PocketBase is licensed under MIT and WWDC under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between PocketBase and WWDC?

PocketBase is written in Go and WWDC in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, PocketBase or WWDC?

Choose PocketBase if you want the larger community (61,338 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose WWDC if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.