head to head · open source

rea vs WWDC

rea has 51,381 GitHub stars, 9,263 forks, 70 open issues and last shipped today. WWDC has 8,742 stars, 767 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. rea leads on adoption by 488% (51,381 vs 8,742 stars). rea is written in TypeScript under MIT; WWDC is written in Swift under BSD-2-Clause. rea has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, WWDC 9%. rea was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rea ★ 51K WWDC ★ 8.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rea WWDC
GitHub stars ★ 51K ★ 8.7K
License MIT BSD-2-Clause
Written in TypeScript Swift
Last push 2026-10-10 2026-06-17
Forks ⑂ 9.3K ⑂ 767
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rea if

  • You weight community size — 51K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rea profile →

pick WWDC if

  • You want the WWDC feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and WWDC fits your workflow better

full WWDC profile →

About rea

REA is an open source MCP server and CLI that lets AI coding agents — and your terminal — reverse engineer native binaries, JavaScript and Electron apps, .NET assemblies, and websites, with evidence attached to every conclusion.

read the full rea overview →

About WWDC

WWDC is an unofficial, open source macOS app for Apple developers who want to watch conference sessions, follow the live schedule, and take searchable notes without leaving their Mac.

read the full WWDC overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 276K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 114K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

rea vs ECC rea vs react rea vs Langflow rea vs Supabase rea vs puppeteer rea vs archify rea vs PocketBase rea vs i-have-adhd rea vs codebase-memory-mcp rea vs herdr rea vs ToolJet rea vs AppSmith

Frequently asked questions

Is rea or WWDC more popular?

rea has 51,381 GitHub stars and WWDC has 8,742. rea has the larger community by that measure.

Are rea and WWDC free?

Both are open source. rea is licensed under MIT and WWDC under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rea and WWDC?

rea is written in TypeScript and WWDC in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rea or WWDC?

Choose rea if you want the larger community (51,381 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose WWDC if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.