head to head · open source

ECC vs i-have-adhd

ECC has 262,175 GitHub stars, 39,235 forks, 207 open issues and last shipped today. i-have-adhd has 48,174 stars, 2,802 forks, 73 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. ECC leads on adoption by 444% (262,175 vs 48,174 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; i-have-adhd is written in Python under MIT. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, i-have-adhd 6%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (developer-tools, productivity), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 262K i-have-adhd ★ 48K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC i-have-adhd
GitHub stars ★ 262K ★ 48K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 39K ⑂ 2.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 262K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick i-have-adhd if

  • You want the i-have-adhd feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and i-have-adhd fits your workflow better

full i-have-adhd profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About i-have-adhd

i have adhd is a skill for coding agents, distributed as a Claude Code plugin, that stops the assistant from burying the answer inside preamble, recap, and closers.

read the full i-have-adhd overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools ECC vs herdr ECC vs lapce ECC vs TipTap

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or i-have-adhd more popular?

ECC has 262,175 GitHub stars and i-have-adhd has 48,174. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and i-have-adhd free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and i-have-adhd under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and i-have-adhd?

ECC is written in JavaScript and i-have-adhd in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or i-have-adhd?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (262,175 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose i-have-adhd if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.