head to head · open source

ECC vs archify

ECC has 261,896 GitHub stars, 39,186 forks, 228 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. archify has 66,725 stars, 4,451 forks, 134 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ECC leads on adoption by 293% (261,896 vs 66,725 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; archify is written in JavaScript under MIT. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, archify 7%. archify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 262K archify ★ 67K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC archify
GitHub stars ★ 262K ★ 67K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 39K ⑂ 4.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 262K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick archify if

  • You want the archify feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and archify fits your workflow better

full archify profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About archify

Archify is an MIT licensed agent skill and Node.js rendering and validation system that turns a codebase or a written system description into a polished, interactive, self contained HTML system map, and it is built for developers and platform teams working inside coding agents such as Cursor, Claude Code, Codex CLI, and OpenCode.

read the full archify overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools ECC vs herdr ECC vs lapce ECC vs TipTap ECC vs Directus

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or archify more popular?

ECC has 261,896 GitHub stars and archify has 66,725. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and archify free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and archify under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and archify?

ECC is written in JavaScript and archify in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or archify?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (261,896 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose archify if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.