head to head · open source

ECC vs Jitsu

ECC has 263,046 GitHub stars, 39,368 forks, 204 open issues and last shipped today. Jitsu has 5,084 stars, 399 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ECC leads on adoption by 5,074% (263,046 vs 5,084 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; Jitsu is written in TypeScript under MIT. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Jitsu 8%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 263K Jitsu ★ 5.1K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC Jitsu
GitHub stars ★ 263K ★ 5.1K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 39K ⑂ 399
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 263K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick Jitsu if

  • You want the Jitsu feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Jitsu fits your workflow better

full Jitsu profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About Jitsu

Jitsu is an MIT licensed, self hostable open source event data platform that collects events from websites, apps and servers and delivers them to data warehouses and other tools, built as a fully scriptable alternative to Segment for data teams and developers who want the pipeline inside their own infrastructure.

read the full Jitsu overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital react vs jitsu openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow react vs nango react vs aci-dev openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools ECC vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or Jitsu more popular?

ECC has 263,046 GitHub stars and Jitsu has 5,084. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and Jitsu free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and Jitsu under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and Jitsu?

ECC is written in JavaScript and Jitsu in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or Jitsu?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (263,046 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Jitsu if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.