head to head · open source

ECC vs Convertigo

ECC has 263,046 GitHub stars, 39,368 forks, 204 open issues and last shipped today. Convertigo has 385 stars, 71 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ECC leads on adoption by 68,224% (263,046 vs 385 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; Convertigo is written in Java under a custom or non-standard licence. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Convertigo 18%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 263K Convertigo ★ 385 category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC Convertigo
GitHub stars ★ 263K ★ 385
License MIT Custom / other
Written in JavaScript Java
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 39K ⑂ 71
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 263K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick Convertigo if

  • You want the Convertigo feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and Convertigo fits your workflow better

full Convertigo profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About Convertigo

Convertigo is an open source, AI driven low code and no code platform for building and running full stack enterprise web, mobile, and PWA business applications, aimed at professional developers who program back end microservice workflows and at non technical citizen developers who assemble form based apps.

read the full Convertigo overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow react vs nango react vs jitsu react vs aci-dev openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools ECC vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or Convertigo more popular?

ECC has 263,046 GitHub stars and Convertigo has 385. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and Convertigo free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT, and Convertigo has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between ECC and Convertigo?

ECC is written in JavaScript and Convertigo in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or Convertigo?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (263,046 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Convertigo if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.