head to head · open source

ECC vs Nango

ECC has 263,046 GitHub stars, 39,368 forks, 204 open issues and last shipped today. Nango has 12,258 stars, 1,359 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ECC leads on adoption by 2,046% (263,046 vs 12,258 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; Nango is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Nango 11%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 263K Nango ★ 12K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC Nango
GitHub stars ★ 263K ★ 12K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 39K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 263K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick Nango if

  • You want the Nango feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Nango fits your workflow better

full Nango profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About Nango

Nango is an open source platform for building product integrations in the developer tools and integration platforms ecosystem. It connects a product and AI agents with 900+ APIs, and it lets developers write integration logic as TypeScript functions or generate that logic with an AI builder before deploying it to Nango's production runtime.

read the full Nango overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital react vs nango openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow react vs jitsu react vs aci-dev openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools ECC vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or Nango more popular?

ECC has 263,046 GitHub stars and Nango has 12,258. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and Nango free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT, and Nango has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between ECC and Nango?

ECC is written in JavaScript and Nango in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or Nango?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (263,046 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Nango if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.