head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs WR.DO
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. WR.DO has 2,291 stars, 363 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 3,968% (93,190 vs 2,291 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; WR.DO is written in TypeScript under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, WR.DO 16%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (docker), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | WR.DO | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 363 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick WR.DO if
- You want the WR.DO feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and WR.DO fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About WR.DO
WR.DO 一站式域名服务平台，集成短链服务、临时邮箱、子域名管理、文件存储和开放API接口。 官方站点 · 部署文档 · 反馈讨论 · English 简体中文 🌟 推荐 Claude Code 稳定 API 渠道：nbility.dev ，支持 claude opus 4 6 等主流 AI Coding 大模型🥳 版本说明 开源版 Demo：likedo.vercel.app 运营版 LikeDo：like.do ，集成 AI Agent 统一调度管理站内资源，内置激励共创系统，点击使用邀请码注册 。 截图预览 功能列表 🔗 短链服务 [功能列表] 支持自定义短链 支持生成自定义二维码 支持密码保护链接 支持设置过期时间 支持访问统计（实时日志、地图等多维度数据分析） 支持调用 API 创建短链 📮 域名邮箱服务 [功能列表] 支持创建自定义前缀邮箱 支持过滤未读邮件列表 可创建无限数量邮箱 支持接收无限制邮件 （依赖 Cloudflare Email Worker） 支持发送邮件（依赖 Resend） 支持 Catch All 配置 支持 Telegram 推送（多频道/群组） 支持调用 API 创建邮箱 支持调用 API 获取收件箱邮件 🌐 子域名管理服务 [功能列表] 支持管理多 Cloudflare 账户下的多个域名的 DNS 记录 支持创建多种 DNS 记录类型（CNAME、A、TXT 等）…
read the full WR.DO overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or WR.DO more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and WR.DO has 2,291. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and WR.DO free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and WR.DO under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and WR.DO?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and WR.DO in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or WR.DO?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose WR.DO if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.