head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs wgcloud
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. wgcloud has 5,193 stars, 910 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,695% (93,190 vs 5,193 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; wgcloud is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, wgcloud 18%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | wgcloud | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 5.2K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Java |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-25 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 910 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick wgcloud if
- You want the wgcloud feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and wgcloud fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About wgcloud
WGCLOUD运维监控系统介绍 WGCLOUD设计思想为新一代极简运维监控系统，提倡快速部署，最大限度降低运维的学习难度，全自动化运行，无模板和脚本，开箱即用。 当前仓库为开源版本v2.3.7最新，二次开发请拉取master分支即可 。 WGCLOUD基于微服务SpringBoot架构开发，是轻量高性能的分布式运维监控系统，核心采集指标包括： 监控服务器和主机的cpu使用率，cpu温度，内存使用率，磁盘容量空间，磁盘IO读写速率，磁盘IOPS，硬盘SMART健康状态，系统负载，MAC地址，连接数量，网卡流量，硬件系统信息，BIOS信息，主板信息，PCI，GPU，防火墙状态，CRONTAB，系统用户最近登录数据，Windows系统服务列表，运行进程，运行端口等信息，以及服务器IPMI监控等 支持监测服务器上的进程应用、文件防篡改、端口、日志、DOCKER容器、数据库、数据表等资源 支持监测服务接口API、网络设备（比如交换机、路由器、打印机）等。自动生成网络拓扑图，大屏可视化，web SSH（堡垒机），巡检报告，指令下发批量执行，告警信息推送（如邮件、钉钉、微信、短信等），自动发现设备，AI自动分析，计划任务，中间件监控，资产管理 1. v2.3.7放弃了之前版本的sigar方式获取主机指标，采用流行的OSHI组件来采集主机指标 2. 采用服务端和代理端协同工作方式，更轻量，更高效，可支持数千台主机同时在线监控 3…
read the full wgcloud overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or wgcloud more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and wgcloud has 5,193. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and wgcloud free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and wgcloud under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and wgcloud?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and wgcloud in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or wgcloud?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose wgcloud if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.