head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs webfunny_monitor
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. webfunny_monitor has 5,307 stars, 883 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,656% (93,190 vs 5,307 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; webfunny_monitor is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, webfunny_monitor 17%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | webfunny_monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 5.3K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-24 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 883 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick webfunny_monitor if
- You want the webfunny_monitor feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and webfunny_monitor fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About webfunny_monitor
前端监控 & Apm后端监控 & 埋点系统 Webfunny是一款集全链路监控和用户行为分析（埋点）系统于一体的大数据分析系统，我们致力于解决线上的疑难杂症和精细化分析业务数据；监控系统面向技术、埋点系统面向业务，两者配合使用，相得益彰。 🚀 立刻体验 ✨ 为什么选择 Webfunny 全链路监控 + 埋点三合一 ：前端监控、APM 后端监控、业务埋点三套系统合一，从用户浏览器到后端服务到数据库，全栈可观测；技术和业务方向全面覆盖； 一键私有化部署 ：仅需 Node.js 环境，支持 Docker，10 分钟完成部署，运维成本极低 无代码入侵 ：引入一段探针代码，自动采集错误、性能、用户行为，无需修改业务逻辑 支持亿级日活 ：底层针对大流量场景优化，支持集群版，高可用场景，不怕业务规模扩张 源码可购买 & 支持二次开发 ：数据完全自主可控，支持按需定制 📊 核心功能 前端监控系统（面向技术团队） APM 后端监控系统（面向后端 & 运维团队） 埋点系统（面向业务团队） 支持平台 ⚡ 快速安装 Docker 安装（推荐） 👉 查看完整 Docker 部署文档 🏢 部分企业用户 已服务 200+ 企业，覆盖互联网、金融、教育、国企等多个行业 💬 联系我们 官网：www.webfunny.com 邮箱：webfunny@163.com 电话：189 3095 0656 微信客服：webfunny2…
read the full webfunny_monitor overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or webfunny_monitor more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and webfunny_monitor has 5,307. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and webfunny_monitor free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and webfunny_monitor under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and webfunny_monitor?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and webfunny_monitor in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or webfunny_monitor?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose webfunny_monitor if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.