head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs Wachd
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Wachd has 42 stars, 5 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 221,781% (93,190 vs 42 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; Wachd is written in Go under a custom or non-standard licence. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Wachd 12%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | Wachd | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 42 |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 5 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Wachd if
- You want the Wachd feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Wachd fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About Wachd
Wachd Self hosted alert intelligence platform with root cause analysis. Wachd receives alerts from your monitoring tools (Grafana, Datadog, Prometheus) and automatically collects context, sanitizes PII, correlates events, and routes a plain English diagnosis to the on call engineer. If Wachd is useful to you, a ⭐ on GitHub helps other engineers find it. Try the live demo → — no install, no cluster, sandbox from just an email. Founders Program — 10 lifetime SMB licenses We're giving 10 engineering teams a lifetime Wachd SMB license at no cost. Deploy it, use it seriously, tell us what's broken. Claim a slot on…
read the full Wachd overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or Wachd more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and Wachd has 42. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and Wachd free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT, and Wachd has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and Wachd?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and Wachd in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or Wachd?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Wachd if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.