head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs Wachd
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars, 8,426 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Wachd has 38 stars, 5 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 240,629% (91,477 vs 38 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; Wachd is written in Go under a custom or non-standard licence. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Wachd 13%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | Wachd | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 38 |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 5 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Wachd if
- You want the Wachd feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Wachd fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About Wachd
Wachd is a self hosted, air gapped alert intelligence platform that uses AI to turn monitoring alerts from tools such as Grafana, Datadog, Prometheus, and Splunk into a plain English root cause diagnosis for the on call engineer.
read the full Wachd overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or Wachd more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars and Wachd has 38. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and Wachd free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT, and Wachd has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and Wachd?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and Wachd in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or Wachd?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,477 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Wachd if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.