head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs traceway
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. traceway has 1,752 stars, 92 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 5,219% (93,190 vs 1,752 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; traceway is written in Go under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, traceway 5%. traceway was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | traceway | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 1.8K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 92 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick traceway if
- You want the traceway feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and traceway fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About traceway
Built on OpenTelemetry OpenTelemetry native observability. Open source. Self hosted in 90 seconds. Website · Docs · Cloud · Discord Traceway is an OpenTelemetry native observability platform. It combines logs, traces, metrics, session replay/RUM, exceptions, AI tracing, and on call paging in one place. Point an OTLP exporter at it and you're in business. No Collector, no glue code, no per language vendor SDK. MIT licensed. No BSL. No "open core." Every feature is in the box. Self host it for free, or run it on Traceway Cloud if you'd rather not babysit infra. 👋 Join the Traceway Community on Discord → Chat with…
read the full traceway overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or traceway more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and traceway has 1,752. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and traceway free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and traceway under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and traceway?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and traceway in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or traceway?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose traceway if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.