head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs Scanopy
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Scanopy has 5,929 stars, 316 forks, 52 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,472% (93,190 vs 5,929 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; Scanopy is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Scanopy 5%. Scanopy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | Scanopy | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 5.9K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 316 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Scanopy if
- You want the Scanopy feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and Scanopy fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About Scanopy
Scanopy Network documentation, without the drawing. Scanopy replaces manual network diagrams with a continuously maintained model of what's actually running. A single daemon scans on a schedule and produces four views from each scan: L2 (physical), L3 (logical), workloads, and applications. Unlike diagrams drawn in draw.io that go stale the week they're saved, or IaC state that misses drift and resources provisioned outside the pipeline, Scanopy reflects the current state of your infrastructure. Export as SVG, Mermaid, or Confluence; embed live maps; or feed the model into your existing source of truth. 💡…
read the full Scanopy overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or Scanopy more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and Scanopy has 5,929. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and Scanopy free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and Scanopy under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and Scanopy?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and Scanopy in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or Scanopy?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Scanopy if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.