head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs s-tui
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped today. s-tui has 5,093 stars, 181 forks, 39 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,697% (91,498 vs 5,093 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; s-tui is written in Python under GPL-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, s-tui 4%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | s-tui | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 5.1K |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 181 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick s-tui if
- You want the s-tui feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and s-tui fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About s-tui
s tui is a terminal based CPU stress and monitoring utility, written in Python and released under the GPL 2.0 licence, that renders CPU temperature, frequency, power and utilization as live graphs for anyone who needs to inspect or load a Linux machine from a text console or an SSH session.
read the full s-tui overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or s-tui more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and s-tui has 5,093. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and s-tui free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and s-tui under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and s-tui?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and s-tui in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or s-tui?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose s-tui if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.