head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs s-tui
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. s-tui has 5,119 stars, 182 forks, 39 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,720% (93,190 vs 5,119 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; s-tui is written in Python under GPL-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, s-tui 4%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | s-tui | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 5.1K |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 182 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick s-tui if
- You want the s-tui feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and s-tui fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About s-tui
The Stress Terminal UI: s tui Stress Terminal UI, s tui, monitors CPU temperature, frequency, power and utilization in a graphical way from the terminal. Screenshot Table of Contents The Stress Terminal UI: s tui Screenshot What it does Usage Simple installation pip (x86 ARM) More installation methods Ubuntu (18.10 and newer) Ubuntu (18.04, 16.04) Debian (10 and newer) Arch Linux, Manjaro OpenSUSE Fedora Options Throttle Indicators Dependencies Configuration Saving a configuration Adding threshold scripts Run from source code Compatibility FAQ Development Contributing Tip What it does Monitoring your CPU…
read the full s-tui overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or s-tui more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and s-tui has 5,119. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and s-tui free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and s-tui under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and s-tui?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and s-tui in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or s-tui?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose s-tui if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.