head to head · open source

Uptime Kuma vs ProxMenux

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ProxMenux has 3,260 stars, 179 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 2,759% (93,190 vs 3,260 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; ProxMenux is written in Python under GPL-3.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, ProxMenux 5%. ProxMenux was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (monitoring, self-hosted), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Uptime Kuma ★ 93K ProxMenux ★ 3.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Uptime Kuma ProxMenux
GitHub stars ★ 93K ★ 3.3K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 179
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Uptime Kuma if

  • You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Uptime Kuma profile →

pick ProxMenux if

  • You want the ProxMenux feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and ProxMenux fits your workflow better

full ProxMenux profile →

About Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…

read the full Uptime Kuma overview →

About ProxMenux

ProxMenux is an interactive toolkit for Proxmox VE — a menu driven CLI plus a web dashboard for post install, backup/restore and continuous health monitoring of your homelab. 📌 Installation To install ProxMenux, simply run the following command in your Proxmox server terminal: ⚠️ Be careful when copying scripts from the internet. Always remember to check the source! 📄 You can review the source code before execution. 🛡️ All executable links follow our Code of Conduct. 📌 How to Use Once installed, launch ProxMenux by running: Then, follow the on screen options to manage your Proxmox server efficiently. 🖥️…

read the full ProxMenux overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Uptime Kuma or ProxMenux more popular?

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and ProxMenux has 3,260. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Uptime Kuma and ProxMenux free?

Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and ProxMenux under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and ProxMenux?

Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and ProxMenux in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or ProxMenux?

Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ProxMenux if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.