head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs ProxMenux
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ProxMenux has 2,978 stars, 155 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 2,972% (91,498 vs 2,978 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; ProxMenux is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, ProxMenux 5%. ProxMenux was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (monitoring, self-hosted), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 13541 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | ProxMenux | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 3.0K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 155 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ProxMenux if
- You want the ProxMenux feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and ProxMenux fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About ProxMenux
ProxMenux is a menu driven Proxmox VE toolkit, licensed GPL 3.0, that pairs an interactive terminal interface for post install and backup/restore work with a self hosted web dashboard for continuous health monitoring, built for homelab operators who run Proxmox on their own hardware.
read the full ProxMenux overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or ProxMenux more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and ProxMenux has 2,978. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and ProxMenux free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and ProxMenux under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and ProxMenux?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and ProxMenux in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or ProxMenux?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ProxMenux if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.