head to head · open source

Uptime Kuma vs pmm

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pmm has 1,125 stars, 238 forks, 240 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 8,184% (93,190 vs 1,125 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; pmm is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, pmm 21%. pmm was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Uptime Kuma ★ 93K pmm ★ 1.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Uptime Kuma pmm
GitHub stars ★ 93K ★ 1.1K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 238
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Uptime Kuma if

  • You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Uptime Kuma profile →

pick pmm if

  • You want the pmm feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and pmm fits your workflow better

full pmm profile →

About Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…

read the full Uptime Kuma overview →

About pmm

Percona Monitoring and Management Percona Monitoring and Management A single pane of glass to easily view and monitor the performance of your MySQL, MongoDB, PostgreSQL, Valkey, and Redis databases. Percona Monitoring and Management (PMM) is the best of breed open source database monitoring solution. It helps you reduce complexity, optimize performance, and improve the security of your business critical database environments, no matter where they are located or deployed. PMM helps users to: Reduce Complexity Optimize Database Performance Improve Data Security See the PMM Documentation for more information. Use…

read the full pmm overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Uptime Kuma or pmm more popular?

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and pmm has 1,125. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Uptime Kuma and pmm free?

Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and pmm under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and pmm?

Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and pmm in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or pmm?

Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pmm if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.