head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs OpenStatus
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenStatus has 9,244 stars, 803 forks, 75 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 908% (93,190 vs 9,244 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; OpenStatus is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, OpenStatus 9%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | OpenStatus | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 9.2K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 803 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick OpenStatus if
- You want the OpenStatus feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and OpenStatus fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About OpenStatus
openstatus The open source status page and uptime monitoring platform. Learn more » Documentation · Website · Discord About openstatus openstatus is an open source platform that combines status pages and uptime monitoring in a single tool. Keep your users informed and your services reliable. Available as a managed service or self hosted. Why openstatus? Status pages + monitoring in one tool — no need to wire up a separate monitoring service 28 global regions checking in parallel across 3 cloud providers Flat pricing, unlimited members — no per seat or per subscriber charges Open source & self hostable — AGPL…
read the full OpenStatus overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or OpenStatus more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and OpenStatus has 9,244. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and OpenStatus free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and OpenStatus under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and OpenStatus?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and OpenStatus in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or OpenStatus?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OpenStatus if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.