head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs Mycodo
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Mycodo has 3,285 stars, 566 forks, 118 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 2,685% (91,498 vs 3,285 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; Mycodo is written in Python under GPL-3.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Mycodo 17%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 13541 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | Mycodo | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 3.3K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-08-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 566 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Mycodo if
- You want the Mycodo feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Mycodo fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About Mycodo
Mycodo is an open source environmental monitoring and regulation system for the Raspberry Pi that couples inputs and outputs to sense and manipulate a physical environment, built for growers, cultivators, and hardware builders who want to run that control themselves.
read the full Mycodo overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or Mycodo more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and Mycodo has 3,285. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and Mycodo free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and Mycodo under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and Mycodo?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and Mycodo in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or Mycodo?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Mycodo if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.