head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs moosestack
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. moosestack has 590 stars, 33 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 15,408% (91,498 vs 590 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; moosestack is written in Rust under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, moosestack 6%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 13541 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | moosestack | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 590 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-07-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 33 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick moosestack if
- You want the moosestack feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and moosestack fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About moosestack
MooseStack is an agent harness, distributed as the @514labs/moose cli npm package under the MIT licence, that gives AI coding agents the interfaces, context, code and skills to build and ship applications on top of open source realtime analytical infrastructure such as ClickHouse.
read the full moosestack overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or moosestack more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and moosestack has 590. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and moosestack free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and moosestack under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and moosestack?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and moosestack in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or moosestack?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose moosestack if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.