head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs MangoHud
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. MangoHud has 9,220 stars, 449 forks, 336 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 911% (93,190 vs 9,220 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; MangoHud is written in C under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, MangoHud 5%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | MangoHud | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 9.2K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | C |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 449 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick MangoHud if
- You want the MangoHud feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You evaluated both and MangoHud fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About MangoHud
MangoHud A Vulkan and OpenGL overlay for monitoring FPS, temperatures, CPU/GPU load and more. MangoHud Installation Build From Source Dependencies Building with build script Installation Pre packaged Binaries GitHub releases Arch based distributions Debian, Ubuntu Fedora Solus openSUSE Flatpak Normal usage OpenGL Hud configuration Environment Variables: MANGOHUD CONFIG , MANGOHUD CONFIGFILE , and MANGOHUD PRESETSFILE Vsync OpenGL Vsync Vulkan Vsync Keybindings Workarounds FPS logging Online visualization: FlightlessMango.com Local visualization: mangoplot Metrics support by GPU vendor/driver Installation Build…
read the full MangoHud overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or MangoHud more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and MangoHud has 9,220. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and MangoHud free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and MangoHud under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and MangoHud?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and MangoHud in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or MangoHud?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose MangoHud if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.