head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs magic-trace
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. magic-trace has 6,345 stars, 222 forks, 70 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,369% (93,190 vs 6,345 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; magic-trace is written in OCaml under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, magic-trace 3%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | magic-trace | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 6.3K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | OCaml |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 222 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick magic-trace if
- You want the magic-trace feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches OCaml
- You evaluated both and magic-trace fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About magic-trace
magic trace Overview magic trace collects and displays high resolution traces of what a process is doing. People have used it to: figure out why an application running in production handles some requests slowly while simultaneously handling a sea of uninteresting requests, look at what their code is actually doing instead of what they think it's doing, get a history of what their application was doing before it crashed, instead of a mere stacktrace at that final instant, ...and much more! magic trace: has 2% 10% overhead, doesn't require application changes to use, traces every function call with 40ns…
read the full magic-trace overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or magic-trace more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and magic-trace has 6,345. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and magic-trace free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and magic-trace under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and magic-trace?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and magic-trace in OCaml. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or magic-trace?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose magic-trace if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.