head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs LoggiFly
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LoggiFly has 1,783 stars, 51 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 5,127% (93,190 vs 1,783 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; LoggiFly is written in Python under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, LoggiFly 3%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (docker, monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | LoggiFly | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 1.8K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 51 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick LoggiFly if
- You want the LoggiFly feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and LoggiFly fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About LoggiFly
LoggiFly Documentation Report Bug Request Feature LoggiFly A Lightweight Tool that monitors Docker Container Logs for predefined keywords or regex patterns and sends Notifications. Get instant alerts for security breaches, system errors, or custom patterns through your favorite notification channels. 🚀 Ideal For : ✅ Catching security breaches (e.g., failed logins in Vaultwarden) ✅ Debugging crashes with attached log context ✅ Restarting containers on specific errors or stopping them completely to avoid restart loops ✅ Monitoring custom app behaviors (e.g., when a user downloads an audiobook on your…
read the full LoggiFly overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or LoggiFly more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and LoggiFly has 1,783. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and LoggiFly free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and LoggiFly under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and LoggiFly?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and LoggiFly in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or LoggiFly?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose LoggiFly if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.