head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs Logfire
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Logfire has 4,530 stars, 349 forks, 191 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,957% (93,190 vs 4,530 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; Logfire is written in Python under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Logfire 8%. Logfire was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | Logfire | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 4.5K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 349 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Logfire if
- You want the Logfire feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Logfire fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About Logfire
Pydantic Logfire: Know more. Build faster. From the team behind Pydantic Validation, Pydantic Logfire is an observability platform built on the same belief as our open source library: that the most powerful tools can be easy to use. What sets Logfire apart: Simple and Powerful: Logfire's dashboard is simple relative to the power it provides, ensuring your entire engineering team will actually use it. Python centric Insights: From rich display of Python objects, to event loop telemetry, to profiling Python code and database queries, Logfire gives you unparalleled visibility into your Python application's…
read the full Logfire overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or Logfire more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and Logfire has 4,530. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and Logfire free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and Logfire under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and Logfire?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and Logfire in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or Logfire?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Logfire if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.