head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs logchef
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. logchef has 899 stars, 57 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 10,078% (91,498 vs 899 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; logchef is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, logchef 6%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 13541 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | logchef | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 899 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 57 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick logchef if
- You want the logchef feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and logchef fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About logchef
Logchef is a lightweight, self hosted log analytics and observability interface for ClickHouse and VictoriaLogs, shipped as a single Go binary under the AGPL 3.0 licence, intended for teams that want a strong query and control plane on top of the log backends they already run.
read the full logchef overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or logchef more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and logchef has 899. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and logchef free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and logchef under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and logchef?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and logchef in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or logchef?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose logchef if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.