head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs lazyjournal
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lazyjournal has 1,406 stars, 34 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 6,408% (91,498 vs 1,406 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; lazyjournal is written in Go under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, lazyjournal 2%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 13541 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | lazyjournal | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-08-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 34 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick lazyjournal if
- You want the lazyjournal feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and lazyjournal fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About lazyjournal
lazyjournal is a terminal user interface, written in Go, for reading and filtering logs from journald, auditd, the file system, Docker and Podman containers, Compose stacks and Kubernetes pods, and it is aimed at system administrators, SREs and developers who need to inspect logs from many different sources without leaving the terminal.
read the full lazyjournal overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or lazyjournal more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and lazyjournal has 1,406. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and lazyjournal free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and lazyjournal under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and lazyjournal?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and lazyjournal in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or lazyjournal?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose lazyjournal if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.