head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs lazyjournal
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lazyjournal has 1,437 stars, 35 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 6,385% (93,190 vs 1,437 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; lazyjournal is written in Go under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, lazyjournal 2%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | lazyjournal | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 35 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick lazyjournal if
- You want the lazyjournal feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and lazyjournal fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About lazyjournal
Terminal user interface for viewing logs from journald , auditd , file system, Docker and Podman containers, Compose stacks and Kubernetes pods with support for log highlighting and several filtering modes. Written in Go with the awesome gocui (fork gocui) library. This tool is inspired by and made with love for LazyDocker and LazyGit. It is also included in Awesome Go, Awesome TUIs and Awesome Docker, check out other useful projects on the repository pages. [!NOTE] You can try it out on the Killercoda playground. Features Simple installation, to run download one executable file without dependencies and…
read the full lazyjournal overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or lazyjournal more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and lazyjournal has 1,437. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and lazyjournal free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and lazyjournal under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and lazyjournal?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and lazyjournal in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or lazyjournal?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose lazyjournal if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.