head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs khi
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped today. khi has 2,083 stars, 97 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped today. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 4,293% (91,498 vs 2,083 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; khi is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, khi 5%. khi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | khi | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 2.1K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 97 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick khi if
- You want the khi feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and khi fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About khi
Language: English 日本語 Kubernetes History Inspector Kubernetes History Inspector (KHI) is a rich log visualization tool for Kubernetes clusters. KHI transforms vast quantities of logs into an interactive, comprehensive timeline view. This makes it an invaluable tool for troubleshooting complex issues that span multiple components within your Kubernetes clusters. Also, KHI is agentless, allowing anyone to access its features without a complicated process. Timeline view Topology view Timeline view visualizes resource status change timings with timeline charts and manifest diffs from Kubernetes audit logs. Topology v…
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or khi more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and khi has 2,083. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and khi free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and khi under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and khi?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and khi in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or khi?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose khi if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.