head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs khi
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. khi has 2,087 stars, 99 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 4,365% (93,190 vs 2,087 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; khi is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, khi 5%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | khi | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 2.1K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 99 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick khi if
- You want the khi feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and khi fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About khi
Language: English 日本語 Kubernetes History Inspector Kubernetes History Inspector (KHI) is a rich log visualization tool for Kubernetes clusters. KHI transforms vast quantities of logs into an interactive, comprehensive timeline view. This makes it an invaluable tool for troubleshooting complex issues that span multiple components within your Kubernetes clusters. Also, KHI is agentless, allowing anyone to access its features without a complicated process. Timeline view Topology view Timeline view visualizes resource status change timings with timeline charts and manifest diffs from Kubernetes audit logs. Topology…
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or khi more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and khi has 2,087. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and khi free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and khi under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and khi?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and khi in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or khi?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose khi if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.