head to head · open source

Uptime Kuma vs Kener

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Kener has 5,237 stars, 320 forks, 65 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,679% (93,190 vs 5,237 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; Kener is written in TypeScript under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Kener 6%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (docker, monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Uptime Kuma ★ 93K Kener ★ 5.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Uptime Kuma Kener
GitHub stars ★ 93K ★ 5.2K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 320
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Uptime Kuma if

  • You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Uptime Kuma profile →

pick Kener if

  • You want the Kener feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Kener fits your workflow better

full Kener profile →

About Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…

read the full Uptime Kuma overview →

About Kener

Kener Stunning Status Pages What is Kener? Kener is a sleek and lightweight status page system built with SvelteKit and NodeJS . It’s not here to replace heavyweights like Datadog or Atlassian but rather to offer a simple, modern, and hassle free way to set up a great looking status page with minimal effort. Designed with ease of use and customization in mind , Kener provides all the essential features you’d expect from a status page—without unnecessary complexity. Why Kener? ✅ Minimal overhead – Set up quickly with a clean, modern UI ✅ Customizable – Easily tailor it to match your brand ✅ Open…

read the full Kener overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Uptime Kuma or Kener more popular?

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and Kener has 5,237. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Uptime Kuma and Kener free?

Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and Kener under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and Kener?

Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and Kener in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or Kener?

Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Kener if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.