head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs Keep
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Keep has 12,474 stars, 1,542 forks, 609 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 647% (93,190 vs 12,474 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; Keep is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Keep 12%. Keep was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | Keep | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 12K |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 1.5K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Keep if
- You want the Keep feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Keep fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About Keep
The open source AIOps and alert management platform Single pane of glass, alert deduplication, enrichment, filtering and correlation, bi directional integrations, workflows, dashboards. Docs · Try it out · Report Bug · Book a Demo · Website 🔍 Single pane of glass Best in class customizable UI for all your alerts and incidents 🛠️ Swiss Army Knife for alerts Deduplication, correlation, filtering and enrichment 🔄 Deep integrations Bi directional syncs with monitoring tools, customizable workflows ⚡ Automation GitHub Actions for your monitoring tools 🤖 AIOps 2.0 AI powered correlation and summarization See full…
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or Keep more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and Keep has 12,474. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and Keep free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT, and Keep has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and Keep?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and Keep in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or Keep?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Keep if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.