head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs HyperDX
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. HyperDX has 9,985 stars, 510 forks, 187 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 833% (93,190 vs 9,985 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; HyperDX is written in TypeScript under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, HyperDX 5%. HyperDX was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | HyperDX | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 10.0K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 510 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick HyperDX if
- You want the HyperDX feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and HyperDX fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About HyperDX
HyperDX HyperDX, a core component of ClickStack, helps engineers quickly figure out why production is broken by making it easy to search & visualize logs and traces on top of any ClickHouse cluster (imagine Kibana, for ClickHouse). Documentation • Chat on Discord • Live Demo • Bug Reports • Contributing • Website 🕵️ Correlate/search logs, metrics, session replays and traces all in one place 📝 Schema agnostic, works on top of your existing ClickHouse schema 🔥 Blazing fast searches & visualizations optimized for ClickHouse 🔍 Intuitive full text search and property search syntax (ex. level:err ), SQL optional!…
read the full HyperDX overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or HyperDX more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and HyperDX has 9,985. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and HyperDX free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and HyperDX under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and HyperDX?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and HyperDX in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or HyperDX?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose HyperDX if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.