head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs HyperDX
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars, 8,426 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. HyperDX has 9,897 stars, 469 forks, 187 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 824% (91,477 vs 9,897 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; HyperDX is written in TypeScript under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, HyperDX 5%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | HyperDX | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 9.9K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 469 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick HyperDX if
- You want the HyperDX feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and HyperDX fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About HyperDX
HyperDX is an open source observability platform that unifies session replays, logs, metrics, traces, and errors. It is built on ClickHouse and OpenTelemetry, and it is positioned as a core component of ClickStack. The project lives in the open source infrastructure and operations ecosystem, especially around log management, application monitoring, frontend monitoring, Kubernetes, and APM.
read the full HyperDX overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or HyperDX more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars and HyperDX has 9,897. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and HyperDX free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and HyperDX under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and HyperDX?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and HyperDX in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or HyperDX?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,477 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose HyperDX if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.