head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs gtop
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gtop has 9,934 stars, 339 forks, 40 open issues and last shipped 12 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 838% (93,190 vs 9,934 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; gtop is written in JavaScript under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, gtop 3%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | gtop | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 9.9K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2025-11-06 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 339 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick gtop if
- You want the gtop feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and gtop fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About gtop
gtop System monitoring dashboard for terminal. Requirements Linux / OSX / Windows (partial support) Node.js = v8 Installation Docker You need to assign host net and pid to access the metrics in the host machine. Usage Start gtop with the gtop command To stop gtop use q , or ctrl+c in most shell environments. You can sort the process table by pressing p : Process Id c : CPU usage m : Memory usage Troubleshooting If you see question marks or other different characters, try to run it with these environment variables: License Released under the MIT license.
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or gtop more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and gtop has 9,934. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and gtop free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and gtop under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and gtop?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and gtop in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or gtop?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose gtop if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.