head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs EasyMonitor
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars, 8,426 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. EasyMonitor has 75 stars, 7 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 27 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 121,869% (91,477 vs 75 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; EasyMonitor is written in PHP under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, EasyMonitor 9%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | EasyMonitor | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 75 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | PHP |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-08-22 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 7 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick EasyMonitor if
- You want the EasyMonitor feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You evaluated both and EasyMonitor fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About EasyMonitor
EasyMonitor is an open source, self hosted uptime and performance monitoring platform for websites and APIs, built for teams that want to run their own checks, alerts, and status pages on their own hardware instead of on a vendor's servers.
read the full EasyMonitor overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or EasyMonitor more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars and EasyMonitor has 75. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and EasyMonitor free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and EasyMonitor under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and EasyMonitor?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and EasyMonitor in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or EasyMonitor?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,477 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose EasyMonitor if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.