head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs EasyLogger
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars, 8,426 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. EasyLogger has 4,749 stars, 1,316 forks, 81 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,826% (91,477 vs 4,749 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; EasyLogger is written in C under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, EasyLogger 28%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | EasyLogger | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 4.7K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | C |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-08-13 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick EasyLogger if
- You want the EasyLogger feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You evaluated both and EasyLogger fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About EasyLogger
EasyLogger is an ultra lightweight, high performance C/C++ logging library with a footprint under 1.6 KB of ROM and 0.3 KB of RAM, aimed at embedded and resource constrained developers who need structured, filterable logs on devices where a full logging framework will not fit.
read the full EasyLogger overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or EasyLogger more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars and EasyLogger has 4,749. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and EasyLogger free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and EasyLogger under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and EasyLogger?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and EasyLogger in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or EasyLogger?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,477 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose EasyLogger if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.