head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs DoKit
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars, 8,426 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. DoKit has 20,415 stars, 3,183 forks, 275 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 348% (91,477 vs 20,415 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; DoKit is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, DoKit 16%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | DoKit | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 20K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Java |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-07 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 3.2K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick DoKit if
- You want the DoKit feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and DoKit fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About DoKit
DoKit is an Apache 2.0 efficiency platform for the full research and development lifecycle of pan frontend products — Android, iOS, mini programs, Flutter and Web — built for mobile developers, test engineers and UI designers who want debugging, performance monitoring and visual inspection tooling inside a debug build instead of hand rolled into each application.
read the full DoKit overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or DoKit more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars and DoKit has 20,415. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and DoKit free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and DoKit under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and DoKit?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and DoKit in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or DoKit?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,477 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose DoKit if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.