head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs dockprom
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dockprom has 6,582 stars, 1,748 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,316% (93,190 vs 6,582 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; dockprom is written in various languages under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, dockprom 27%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (docker, monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | dockprom | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 6.6K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | — |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-03-06 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 1.7K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick dockprom if
- You want the dockprom feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- You evaluated both and dockprom fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About dockprom
dockprom A monitoring solution for Docker hosts and containers with Prometheus, Grafana, cAdvisor, NodeExporter and alerting with AlertManager. Install Clone this repository on your Docker host, cd into dockprom directory and run compose up: Caddy v2 does not accept plaintext passwords. It MUST be provided as a hash value. The above password hash corresponds to ADMIN PASSWORD 'admin'. To know how to generate hash password, refer Updating Caddy to v2 Prerequisites: Docker Engine = 1.13 Docker Compose = 1.11 Updating Caddy to v2 Perform a docker run rm caddy caddy hash password plaintext 'ADMIN PASSWORD' in order…
read the full dockprom overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or dockprom more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and dockprom has 6,582. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and dockprom free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and dockprom under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and dockprom?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and dockprom in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or dockprom?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose dockprom if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.