head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs django-silk
Uptime Kuma has 92,651 GitHub stars, 8,577 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped today. django-silk has 4,996 stars, 378 forks, 130 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,755% (92,651 vs 4,996 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; django-silk is written in Python under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, django-silk 8%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | django-silk | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 5.0K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.6K | ⑂ 378 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick django-silk if
- You want the django-silk feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and django-silk fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About django-silk
Silk Silk is a live profiling and inspection tool for the Django framework. Silk intercepts and stores HTTP requests and database queries before presenting them in a user interface for further inspection: Contents Requirements Installation Features Configuration Authentication/Authorisation Request/Response bodies Meta Profiling Recording a fraction of requests Ignoring specific paths Limiting request/response data Clearing logged data Contributing Development Environment Requirements Silk has been tested with: Django: 5.2, 6.0, 6.1 Python: 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, 3.13, 3.14, 3.15 Installation Via pip into a…
read the full django-silk overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or django-silk more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 92,651 GitHub stars and django-silk has 4,996. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and django-silk free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and django-silk under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and django-silk?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and django-silk in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or django-silk?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (92,651 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose django-silk if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.