head to head · open source

Uptime Kuma vs databuff

Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped today. databuff has 683 stars, 136 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 13,296% (91,498 vs 683 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; databuff is written in Java under AGPL-3.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, databuff 20%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Uptime Kuma ★ 91K databuff ★ 683 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Uptime Kuma databuff
GitHub stars ★ 91K ★ 683
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 8.4K ⑂ 136
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Uptime Kuma if

  • You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Uptime Kuma profile →

pick databuff if

  • You want the databuff feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and databuff fits your workflow better

full databuff profile →

About Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.

read the full Uptime Kuma overview →

About databuff

DataBuff — AI Native APM Built On Opentelemetry Mission: build the strongest OpenTelemetry APM backend AI native · OTLP native · multi agent out of the box · self hosted traces, metrics, topology Live Demo · Documentation · Open Source APM · 简体中文 · Community AI multi agent troubleshooting · Service health · Call graph topology Keywords : AI Native APM · OpenTelemetry APM · OTLP Backend · Multi Agent · Distributed Tracing · AIOps · Open Source APM · MCP · Self Hosted Observability What is DataBuff DataBuff is an AI native APM backend built on Opentelemetry — ingest traces, metrics, and logs via OTLP, with full sta…

read the full databuff overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn uptime-kuma vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs plakar uptime-kuma vs pluton worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Uptime Kuma vs worldmonitor Uptime Kuma vs NetData Uptime Kuma vs Grafana Uptime Kuma vs huginn Uptime Kuma vs Sentry Uptime Kuma vs SigNoz Uptime Kuma vs Grafana Loki Uptime Kuma vs beszel Uptime Kuma vs cilium Uptime Kuma vs Apache SkyWalking Uptime Kuma vs jaeger Uptime Kuma vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Uptime Kuma or databuff more popular?

Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and databuff has 683. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Uptime Kuma and databuff free?

Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and databuff under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and databuff?

Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and databuff in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or databuff?

Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose databuff if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.